Conflicto neurovascular trigeminal: ¿Cuál es el factor predictor más confiable?

Abstract

Introduction: The American Academy of Neurology proposes that, for a patient to be a candidate for trigeminal neurovascular decompression (NVD), the presence of neurovascular contact must be demonstrated through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, recent studies have shown that the sensitivity of MRI to diagnose a neurovascular conflict (NVC) is highly variable. These antagonistic concepts put, the neurosurgeon, in a real dilemma when making decisions about this entity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of clinical and MRI as a predictor of a real NVC.
Methods: This is a retrospective analytical study including 81 patients undergoing NVD to treat trigeminal neuralgia (TN), from January 2013 to April 2019, in Tucumán.
Results: When considering the complete series: A) Of the total of 65 patients who had typical TN, 64 (98.5%) presented NVC during surgery and B) Of the 16 atypical TN, none of then presented NVC during the surgery. When considering patients with primary TN: A) 98% of the patients with typical NT presented a NVC during surgery and B) there was a group of patients where NVC was evidenced during surgery but it wasn`t noticed during the preoperative MRI (n=15), the negative predictive value of the MRI was only 6%.
Conclusion: The patient's clinic is more effective than the MRI deciging whether or not to perform NVD surgery.